Okay, enough of the oscar speech- I'll save it for when I'm being interviewed by the cyrogenically-preserved head of Michael Parkinson forty years from now. Till then, on with the show.
[Note: The below post was supposed to go out weeks and weeks ago for topicality; but the weather gods favour me, for the snow persists in certain areas still.]
I mention the above as, for the past few months, the weather in London too has been quite irregular: it has been icier than Nicole Kidman stuck in a fridge in the middle of the Antarctic. Perfect weather for heating up the topic of climate change. I've lost track of the amount of news reports I've seen recently where some talking-head-boffin is going on and on about the damage we're doing all doing to the planet and how the events in Emmerich's movie "could theoretically happen". Jaysis, talk about putting the mentalist in environmentalist.
Firstly, Emmerich is not a documentary-maker; this is the guy who made Independence Day and Godzilla for Christ's sake. And I don't see people scanning the horizon for giant lizards just yet.
Secondly, okay: maybe we are doing damage to the planet, and maybe that is bringing about global climactic changes. But in that case, what brought about the last five ice ages, I ask? The dinosaurs perhaps? After all, it's a well-known fact that Stegosaurs were notorious hairspray-users; tsk, all those nasty CFCs. And don't get me started on the Tyrannosaurs.. Does the following exchange sound familiar:
Mrs T-Rex: (looking into the bin) Ah for fecks* sake...Terry!
Mr T-Rex: (looking up from his newspaper) What?
Mrs T-Rex: Terry, get your prehistoric arse out here.
Mr T-Rex: (folds up The Cretaceous Times and huffily goes to his wife in the kitchen) What is it?
Mrs T-Rex: (wagging a claw at her husband) Now I'm telling you for the last time. Repeat after me: "the Triceratop horns go in the GREEN bin; decaying Compsognathus remains and smaller creatures go in the BLACK bin."
Mr T-Rex: (sheepishly murmuring) Triceratop horns, green bin... the rest of the stuff, black bin.
Mrs T-Rex: Good, now remember that for next time. Honestly, no respect for the environment...
*(Yes, these are Irish Dinosaurs; or DinO'Saurs, if you will)
Fair enough, the above exchange may not have technically happened. Er..ever. But I'm just getting sick of being chastised by all these scientists. It's the environmental equivalent of arriving late to a houseparty and being blamed for a pool of vomit already on the bathroom floor (incidentally, I should probably confess that I have vomited in various bathrooms in my time, but hey mea culpa, I've cleaned the mess). I'll do my best to be environmentally-friendly, but fuck if I'm gonna be blamed for previous generations...
There are many competing theories surrounding the causes of 'ice age' periods. The 'snowball earth' theory for example, posits that the Earth's surface became nearly or entirely frozen over at least once during three periods between 650 and 750 million years ago; in other words, before humans first began walking upright. And therefore presumably before they began farming...
Although several people are credited with initially positing this theory (Mawson, Harland, Budyko, amongst others), it was Kirschivink (1992) who first used the term:
"Whatever the triggering mechanism, if the earth had normal obliquity during an equatorial glaciation we would expect thatareas of high latitude would be at least as cold, if not colder,than the equator...the earth would have resembled a highly reflective 'snowball'."
Ruddiman (2003) however suggests that, rather than being triggered by human effects since the advent of the Industrial Era, the possible causes date back to early farmers some 8,000 years ago:
"Cyclic variations in CO2 andCH4 driven by Earth-orbital changes during the last 350,000 years predict decreases throughout the Holocene, but the CO2 trend began an anomalous increase 8,000 years ago, and the CH4 trend did so 5,000 years ago."
Ruddiman, William F. (2003). "The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Era Began Thousands of Years Ago". Climatic Change 61 (3): 261–293.
But perhaps the most persuasive argument is also the most hypothetical. As Spector (2008) radically postulates:
"If Mr T and the Fonz were ever to high five, it would bring about another ice age."
So the message is therefore simple. Almost Biblical: be foolish to the environment and thou shalt be pitied.
But enough of the serious stuff; the cold snap has not been without its little merits. True, I have fallen on my arse more than a few times, but it's a small price to pay just for the comic joy in watching other people fall on theirs. Schadenfreude? Exakt, mein freund.
For instance, I was down in Portarlington over Christmas, slipped on some ice, and did one of those suspended-in-mid-air-for-about-four-seconds kinda falls, before landing unceremoniously on my arse. Fortunately, I miraculously managed to save the bottle of vodka I was carrying. Two kids on bikes were stopped a short distance down the road, and both burst into laughter upon seeing me fall. I picked myself up, swore at the footpath (as if it were somehow to blame) and continued on. The two kids, their laughter ceased, cycled up to me and asked was I all right- still, I notice, suppressing some giggles. I grumpily said I was fine, and trudged onward through the ice and slush. The two kids shrugged and started to cycle away. Without warning, both then slipped on the ice and fell face first to the ground. HAH! Karma, my young friends, is a cruel mistress.
Another perk of the cold weather is that I've discovered a new form of gambling to play in the office. It's kind of like poker, but with snow. In fact, I'm going to christen the game... snow-ker.
The Game:
The premise of snowker is quite simple: you gamble on the zealousness (zealousy?) of co-workers who live as far away from work as you do. You basically take the chance that anyone living as far away from work as you do might actually make the extra-special effort to come in.
The Rules:
- no contact with anyone else in the competition (unless of course, a co-player is your friend, in which case they're likely to be so work-shy that they'd be taking the day off anyway).
- you can only play on the first day of snow (i.e. no testing the water by seeing who the office eager-beavers are).
- you cannot contact a colleague already in the office to check who else has made it in, then come in late yourself.
The Outcome:
It obviously looks better to senior management if you, and you alone, are the sole person from your postcode to make it into work on a particularly snowy day. Having said that, your colleagues will probably think you're a brown-nosing creep. The best outcome therefore is if everyone plays and no one comes into work. I am sure seasoned economists can apply game theory to this approach and compute the various permutations, but the main conclusion I've drawn from the game is: united we slack, divided we fall.
In summary, whether the snow brings you images of wintry holocausts, or endless rounds of snowker, try to make the most of it: it won't last forever. Hopefully.
Okay, I'm flatlining: time to call it day. Fifth blog in as many hours; time to unhook myself from this caffeine drip and get some....whatya call it, whatya call it (clicks fingers repeatedly)...oh that's it: sleep.
CB















